On Jan 27, 9:40 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > On 27 Jan., 01:55, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jan 26, 10:51 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > > The set of indexes is 1 + the decadic > > > logarithm of L. > > > Nope, 1+ the decadic logarithm of L is the cardinality > > of the set of indexes. > > I know.
So do not make silly statements about what the set of indexes is.
You are taking the limit of
1+decadic logarithm of L
You are not taking the limit of sets but the limit of cardinalites of sets. The limit you calculate is not a limit set, nor the cardinality of a limit set.