|
|
Re: Matheology § 200
Posted:
Jan 27, 2013 8:04 AM
|
|
On Jan 27, 9:40 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 27 Jan., 01:55, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 26, 10:51 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>
> > > The set of indexes is 1 + the decadic
> > > logarithm of L.
>
> > Nope, 1+ the decadic logarithm of L is the cardinality
> > of the set of indexes.
>
> I know.
So do not make silly statements
about what the set of indexes is.
You are taking the limit of
1+decadic logarithm of L
You are not taking the limit of sets
but the limit of cardinalites of sets.
The limit you calculate is not a limit set, nor the
cardinality of a limit set.
|
|
