> Ok. So you seem to be saying that (unlike the lone Nam Nguyen) > everyone should not think that it's impossible to know the truth > value of cGC since "its truth value might be discovered tomorrow", > according to your knowledge about mathematical logic.
> But, A) what's the technical definition of "might be discovered > tomorrow"? "Tomorrow" relative to which side of the International > Date line? The Australia side? or the US side? And B) what happens > if before "tomorrow" has arrived, "today" somebody would discover > the truth value of cGC, rendering "might be discovered tomorrow" > _meaningless_ ?
Congratulations on two of the dumbest points ever made on sci.math. Man, that's something.
-- "Your people are about denial. Dreams versus reality. TELLING yourselves you are great. Telling yourselves you are brilliant. Telling yourselves you understand mathematics." --James S. Harris: So obvious that it's kind of sad.