|
|
Re: Matheology § 200
Posted:
Jan 28, 2013 3:56 AM
|
|
On 27 Jan., 23:25, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> In article
> > The cardinality of the indexes of this limit in
> > analysis is aleph_0.
>
> > The sequence of cardinalities is 2, 1, 3, 2, 4, 3, ... The limit of
> > this sequence is aleph_0 too.
>
> > > The limit you calculate is not a limit set, nor the
> > > cardinality of a limit set.
>
> > Analysis shows that the cardinality of the digits is 1 + logn. This
> > does not break down for n = oo.
>
> Since we are talking about a sequence of sets, not a sequence of
> numbers. "1+log(n)" is irrelevant.
I am talking about a sequence of sets, namely the indexed digits of
numbers, and their cardinality is 1 + log(n).
Regards, WM
|
|
