Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 201
Replies: 32   Last Post: Jan 28, 2013 2:26 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Virgil Posts: 8,833 Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 201
Posted: Jan 28, 2013 2:26 PM

In article
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 28 Jan., 10:34, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Jan 28, 10:16 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >

> > > On 28 Jan., 09:58, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > Either
> >
> > > >    i and ii. cannot be true at the same time.
> > > >    i. true implies ii. false

> >
> > > >    or
> >
> > > >    It is not know that  i. and ii. cannot be
> > > >    true at the same time

> >
> > > >    i. true does not imply ii. false
> >
> > > > Are you claiming that it is not known that i.
> > > > and ii. cannot be true at the same time?

> >

>
> I did. What have you not understood?

We do not understand why you object to such statements as

For all n in |N, 2*(n+1) = 2*n + 2
--