Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
Formally Unknowability, or absolute Undecidability, of certain arithmetic formulas.
Replies:
22
Last Post:
Jan 29, 2013 8:21 PM




Re: Formally Unknowability, or absolute Undecidability, of certain arithmetic formulas.
Posted:
Jan 29, 2013 12:38 AM


On 28/01/2013 12:06 AM, fom wrote: > On 1/27/2013 11:22 AM, Nam Nguyen wrote: > >> In this thread, we propose a solution to this differentiation >> difficulty: semantic _reinterpretation_ of _logical symbols_ . > > It sounds more like "coordinated interpretation." > > That is what mathematical realism is already doing. > The existence quantifier is cointerpreted with some > notion of truth. This is the historical debate > from description theory addressing presupposition failure. > > One of the foundational insights of Frege's researches > was to interpret contradiction existentially. In > contrast, Kant interpreted contradiction modally. > This would suggest nonexistence and impossibility > are already coordinated in such a way that the > two forms of logic branch at the outset. > > There are, of course, intensional logics that > mix the senses of these logics. This is where > the terms "de re" and "de facto" find their > nuanced meanings in relation to quantifieroperator > order. > > No one, of course, has tried to use anything > like an arithmetical numbering to provide > correlated, but distinct, model theories to > interpret a single situation (quantificational > logic) so as to eliminate irrelevant modal > possibilities.
Would you have any link on "coordinated interpretation"?
I'm not sure if all of those logic's would be related to my proposal here, which is simply reinterpreting the logical symbols _ in any_ _which way_ one would feel pleased, provided that:
a) The reinterpretations be cohesively meaningful (and logical).
b) Certain corresponding provision for formula's truth and falsehood be available.
  There is no remainder in the mathematics of infinity.
NYOGEN SENZAKI 



