|
Re: ZFC and God
Posted:
Jan 29, 2013 7:25 AM
|
|
On 29 Jan., 12:41, "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...@phiwumbda.org> wrote: > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> writes: > >> AGH! You just rejected my definition and said that a decimal is > >> terminating iff it is in the set of terminating decimals, and you > >> define that set with reference to the definition of terminating > >> decimal. > > >> Never mind. The point remains. The number 0.777... is not in T. > > > Then show it! Show a digit that lies beyond all digits of terminating > > decimals. > > That is unnecessary and irrelevant.
Neither nor. Be so good and show it, if you know a way.
> All I need to show is that, for > every function f:{1,...,k} -> {0,...,9}, > > 0.777 != sum_i=1^k f(i)*1-^-i. > > I did that days ago. You snipped it.
It is unnecessary and irrelevant. But contrary to the question I put above, I knew this "proof" already before you showed it. So do me a favour and show what is requred and not what is not asked for. > > > Or do you claim that it is impossible to distinguish terminating and > > non-terminating by digits? Or do you claim that it is impossible to > > work in the domain of terminating decimals? > > Why can't you support your claims? > > I believe that it is obvious to the casual observer who is failing to > support his claims. We are going in circles here because you are > honestly too incompetent to understand how to apply a definition.
You are wrong. I understand what you "proved" and I judge that it is completely irrelevant. > > There is no point in continuing this conversation.
Of course you have to withdraw because you cannot show what is required, namely how a terminating decimal by replacing digits (not by division) can yield a non-terminating decimal > > It is literally a shame that such a stupid man is allowed to teach his > addled thoughts on mathematics. Shame on you and shame on your > school.
That is the natural reaction of persons like you.
Again: You and every mathematician is challenged to prove that by the simple operation of exchanging digits a set of terminating decimals can yield a non-terminating decimal.
Regards, WM
|
|