In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 29 Jan., 19:54, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: > > On 1/29/2013 12:21 PM, WM wrote: > > > > > Done several times. Nevertheless logic and analysis can get along > > > without sets. And that better than with. > > > > Have you any references for the presentation > > of analysis without sets? > > > > I mean, here, textbooks. I would love to > > look at one. > > Is that a real question? > A very good book without any sets: > Euler: Introductio in analysin infinitorum > Or newer and at least without actually infinite sets, i.e., without > *trans*finite sets my book: > http://www.oldenbourg-verlag.de/wissenschaftsverlag/mathematik-ersten-semester > /9783486708219avoid WM.