Virgil
Posts:
8,833
Registered:
1/6/11


Re: Endorsement of Wolfgang Mueckenheim from a serious mathematician
Posted:
Jan 30, 2013 4:05 AM


In article <be25af6f9ad74bcda2d14e479418c2b4@k4g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fhaugsburg.de> wrote:
> On 30 Jan., 02:26, "W. Dale Hall" <wdh...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > > david petry wrote: > > > > > Doron Zeilberger wrote the following in an opinion piece on his website: > > > > > "Read Wolfgang Mueckenheim's fascinating book ! I especially like the > > > bottom > > > > > of page 112 and the top of page 113, that prove, once and for all, > > that (at least) > > > > > the actual infinity is pure nonsense." > > > > >http://www.math.rutgers.edu/~zeilberg/Opinion68.html > > > > > I'd be interested in seeing an English translation of the bottom of page > > > 112 and the top of page 113. > > > > I suppose you missed the statement that immediately followed that: > > > > Clarification added Aug. 25, 2011: My endorsement of Wolfgang > > Mueckenheim's wonderful book is purely philosophical. I have no > > expertise, or interest, in checking any possible technical > > claims that he may have made. > > Have you seen the difference in dates?
Unless the clarification is dated earlier than the original, what difference does it make? 

