Virgil
Posts:
4,482
Registered:
1/6/11
|
|
Re: Endorsement of Wolfgang Mueckenheim from a serious mathematician
Posted:
Jan 30, 2013 4:27 AM
|
|
In article
<b8ae4596-d84a-4752-bb5a-f5f51a5966ad@l9g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 30 Jan., 02:00, david petry <david_lawrence_pe...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Doron Zeilberger wrote the following in an opinion piece on his website:
> >
> > "Read Wolfgang Mueckenheim's fascinating book ! I especially like the
> > bottom of page 112 and the top of page 113, that prove, once and for all,
> > that (at least) the actual infinity is pure nonsense."
> >
> > http://www.math.rutgers.edu/~zeilberg/Opinion68.html
> >
> > I'd be interested in seeing an English translation of the bottom of page
> > 112 and the top of page 113.
>
> It is essentially this:
> http://planetmath.org/?op=getobj&from=objects&id=12607
Which only shows that while figures do not lie, liars often figure.
Such a silly sequence when give two or more such totally different
interpretations can be made to have as many limits s interpretations.
Particularly when it is being done in WMytheology.
It also carefully ignores that many, if not most, sequences do not have
any limit at all, and the ones claimed are, at best dubious.
That same swindle has been tried here before and been debunked.
--
|
|
