Virgil
Posts:
4,482
Registered:
1/6/11
|
|
Re: Endorsement of Wolfgang Mueckenheim from a serious mathematician
Posted:
Jan 30, 2013 4:31 AM
|
|
In article
<48c81fb5-26ba-4f84-aebe-eefa8702721b@v5g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 30 Jan., 02:00, david petry <david_lawrence_pe...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Doron Zeilberger wrote the following in an opinion piece on his website:
> >
> > "Read Wolfgang Mueckenheim's fascinating book ! I especially like the
> > bottom of page 112 and the top of page 113, that prove, once and for all,
> > that (at least) the actual infinity is pure nonsense."
> >
> > http://www.math.rutgers.edu/~zeilberg/Opinion68.html
> >
> > I'd be interested in seeing an English translation of the bottom of page
> > 112 and the top of page 113.
>
> It is essentially this:
If WM interprets a sequence in different ways one can sometimes make it
seem to have as many limits as interpretations, even though there is no
standard limit at all.
--
|
|
