The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Building a Better Microscope
Replies: 3   Last Post: Feb 1, 2013 5:11 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 22
Registered: 6/10/11
Re: Building a Better Microscope
Posted: Jan 30, 2013 10:09 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

"Kevin" <> wrote in message
> Ya know, I met this kid in college and his major was physics... He
> was
> absolutely positive that he could make cold fusion work and he wasn't
> going to let anything stand in his way... Uh, cold fusion has been
> discredited and so what are the implications of that? Uh, Well, I'm
> obsessed with building a better microscope... No one will pay me to
> do
> it since cold fusion has been discredited... It isn't like there
> should be any obvious link between the two but...
> It is a bit of friendly academic tit for tat in speculating what is a
> sphere in higher academe... The major priority in building a better
> microscope is to determine how to freeze coarse adjustments to
> facilitate fine adjustments...
> A sphere ultimately must mean to identify whatever it is that requires
> 'global initiative' in order to obtain an objective view of what the
> odds of success are... Basically, Fermilab seems to be most capable of
> building a better microscope but that is bad news for me and the rest
> of us if Fermilab is a political num-num that helps just the Japanese.

What kind of microscope?

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.