Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
Dare
Posts:
22
Registered:
6/10/11
|
|
Re: Building a Better Microscope
Posted:
Jan 30, 2013 10:09 AM
|
|
"Kevin" <barry196263@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:a1d26ca4-00ef-42f1-9b44-ff68550d6ebd@h2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
> Ya know, I met this kid in college and his major was physics... He
> was
> absolutely positive that he could make cold fusion work and he wasn't
> going to let anything stand in his way... Uh, cold fusion has been
> discredited and so what are the implications of that? Uh, Well, I'm
> obsessed with building a better microscope... No one will pay me to
> do
> it since cold fusion has been discredited... It isn't like there
> should be any obvious link between the two but...
> It is a bit of friendly academic tit for tat in speculating what is a
> sphere in higher academe... The major priority in building a better
> microscope is to determine how to freeze coarse adjustments to
> facilitate fine adjustments...
>
> A sphere ultimately must mean to identify whatever it is that requires
> 'global initiative' in order to obtain an objective view of what the
> odds of success are... Basically, Fermilab seems to be most capable of
> building a better microscope but that is bad news for me and the rest
> of us if Fermilab is a political num-num that helps just the Japanese.
What kind of microscope?
|
|
|
|
