Virgil
Posts:
4,674
Registered:
1/6/11
|
|
Re: Matheology � 203
Posted:
Jan 30, 2013 8:11 PM
|
|
In article <a3cc326d-badc-47e1-98b4-ee058530b504@w3g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 30 Jan., 12:32, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Jan 30, 12:21 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > > > On 30 Jan., 12:02, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Summary. We have agreed that > > > > > > For a potentially infinite list L, the > > > > antidiagonal of L is not a line of L. > > > > Do you agree with the statement > > > > For a potentially infinite list, L, > > of potentially infinite 0/1 sequences > > the antidiagonal of L is not a line > > of L > > Yes, of course.
Thus every merely potentially infinite list is incomplete.
As is every actually infinite list of actually infinite sequences of two or more symbols, even outside of Wolkenmuekenheim. --
|
|