Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Order Isomorphic
Replies: 5   Last Post: Feb 3, 2013 12:13 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Butch Malahide Posts: 894 Registered: 6/29/05
Re: Order Isomorphic
Posted: Jan 31, 2013 2:00 AM

On Jan 30, 11:01 pm, William Elliot <ma...@panix.com> wrote:
> Is every infinite subset S of omega_0 with the inherited order,
> order isomorphic to omega_0?

Yes, of course. (And you don't need the subscript; omega without a
subscript means omega_0, the first infinite ordinal.)

> Yes.  S is an ordinal, a denumerable ordinal.
> Let eta be the order type of S.

No, S is *not* an ordinal, unless S = omega. S is a subset of an
ordinal, so it's a well-ordered set, so it's isomorphic to an ordinal,
so it's order type is an ordinal.

> [. . .]
> Does the same reasoning hold to show that an uncountable subset
> of omega_1 with the inherited order is order isomorphic to omega_1.

Yes, of course. The ordinal omega_1 is the unique ordinal such that
(a) it';s uncountable, and (b) each of its proper initial segments is
countable. Any well-ordered set with those two properties is
isomorphic to omega_1. If S is an uncountable subset of omega_1, then
S (with the natural order) has those two properties.

More generally (and just as trivially), if kappa is an initial
ordinal, and if S is a subset of kappa which has the the same
cardinality as kappa, then S is order-isomorphic to kappa.

Date Subject Author
1/31/13 William Elliot
1/31/13 Butch Malahide
2/1/13 William Elliot
1/31/13 David C. Ullrich
2/2/13 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
2/3/13 David C. Ullrich