In article <8679e709-1251-4e4f-a361-d63e54eba703@x18g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 31 Jan., 11:31, Tonic...@yahoo.com wrote: > > > If a mathematician claims "there is a proof of so and so in this paper" > > then one assumes he already checked the said proof or at least was led by > > authiority to believe the said proof is there. > > You talk about Hilbert's sketch of his proof of CH?
He certainly does not talk about any claims of proof by Muekenheim. --
