|
|
Re: Endorsement of Wolfgang Mueckenheim from a serious mathematician
Posted:
Feb 1, 2013 4:31 AM
|
|
On 1 Feb., 10:23, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> In article
> <abc2008b-5c80-44c6-9091-22f125692...@h2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
>
> WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > And if I append to every finite path every infinite tail that has a
> > finite definition like 0.[001]? What will you choose then???
> > Nevertheles I will have used only countably many paths yet.
>
> That you have only used countably many does not mean that there are not
> many more than you have used.
>
> And is has been shown many times, and beyond WM's ability to falsify,
> that the number of paths in a Complete Infinite Binary Tree is beyond
> counting (that is, there is not, and cannot be, any mapping from |N to
> the set of paths that uses us every path.
And it has been shown, unfortunately beyond Virgils ability to
comprehend the consequences, that there are not more reals in
mathematics. Therefore, we have a contradiction.
Regards, WM
|
|
