The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Building a Better Microscope
Replies: 3   Last Post: Feb 1, 2013 5:11 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 70
Registered: 1/11/10
Re: Building a Better Microscope
Posted: Feb 1, 2013 5:11 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Jan 31, 7:48 am, Kevin <> wrote:
> On Jan 30, 9:09 am, "Dare" <> wrote:

> > "Kevin" <> wrote in
> > > Ya know, I met this kid in college and his major was physics... He
> > > was
> > > absolutely positive that he could make cold fusion work and he wasn't
> > > going to let anything stand in his way... Uh, cold fusion has been
> > > discredited and so what are the implications of that? Uh, Well, I'm
> > > obsessed with building a better microscope... No one will pay me to
> > > do
> > > it since cold fusion has been discredited... It isn't like there
> > > should be any obvious link between the two but...
> > > It is a bit of friendly academic tit for tat in speculating what is a
> > > sphere in higher academe... The major priority in building a better
> > > microscope is to determine how to freeze coarse adjustments to
> > > facilitate fine adjustments...

> > > A sphere ultimately must mean to identify whatever it is that requires
> > > 'global initiative' in order to obtain an objective view of what the
> > > odds of success are... Basically, Fermilab seems to be most capable of
> > > building a better microscope but that is bad news for me and the rest
> > > of us if Fermilab is a political num-num that helps just the Japanese.

> > What kind of microscope?- Hide quoted text -
> > - Show quoted text -
> A scanning tunneling electron microscope... I say that they don't work
> properly if they neglect the limitations of strong weak interaction...
> Spiral structures would suggest that something is neglected by strong
> weak interaction but scanning tunneling electron microscopes build on
> the premise of strong weak interaction, ergo, a better microscope then
> the ones we have presently has premise.

So what do you want to see with it?
Arindam Banerjee

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.