Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Topic: Quadruple with (a, b, c, d)
Replies: 2   Last Post: Feb 2, 2013 11:33 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 mina_world Posts: 2,144 Registered: 12/13/04
Quadruple with (a, b, c, d)
Posted: Feb 2, 2013 5:26 AM

Hello teacher~

Suppose not all four integers a, b, c, d are equal.
Start with (a, b, c, d) and repeatedly replace (a, b, c, d)
by (a-b, b-c, c-d, d-a).

Then at least one number of the quadruple will eventually
become arbitrarily large.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Solution)
Let P_n = (a_n, b_n, c_n, d_n) be the quadruple after n iterations.
Then a_n + b_n + c_n + d_n = 0 for n >= 1.

A very importand function for the point P_n in 4-space
is the square of its distance from the origin (0,0,0,0),
which is (a_n)^2 + (b_n)^2 + (c_n)^2 + (d_n)^2.

....
omission
For reference, text copy with jpg.
http://board-2.blueweb.co.kr/user/math565/data/math/olilim.jpg
...

for n >=2,
(a_n)^2 + (b_n)^2 + (c_n)^2 + (d_n)^2
>= {2^(n-1)}*{(a_1)^2 + (b_1)^2 + (c_1)^2 + (d_1)^2}.

The distance of the points P_n from the origin increases without bound,
which means that at least one component must become arbitrarily large

----------------------------------------------------------------
Hm, my question is...

I know that a_n + b_n + c_n + d_n = 0
and
I know that (a_n)^2 + (b_n)^2 + (c_n)^2 + (d_n)^2 increases without bound.

I can't understand that "at least one component must become arbitrarily
large".
I need your logical explanation or proof.

Date Subject Author
2/2/13 mina_world
2/2/13 quasi
2/2/13 mina_world