In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 2 Feb., 11:17, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: > > > Ok. So, you are introducing the kind of arguments > > used by Wittgenstein. Of course, Wittgenstein never > > gave a coherent explanation for classical mathematics. > > Neither did ZFC.
The difference being that ZFC was not trying to.
> > His criticisms, however, are easily seen to be forebears > > of much of the discrete mathematics that has become > > so important with the advent of computing technology. > > Mathematical discourse is impossible without the means of > communication that are available in phyical reality.
It is a shame then that WM is so incompetent at using them. --