On 3 Feb, 01:48, "porky_pig...@my-deja.com" <porky_pig...@my-deja.com> wrote: > On Thursday, January 31, 2013 11:23:14 PM UTC-5, JT wrote: > > To me it seem that the naturals are discrete in nature and that zero > > > really not a natural number or even a number. Regarding infinity we > > > can not have a view of something where we do not have a full set > > > handwaving shouting infinity really do not help. > > > For me each natural must be a continuum fractions is just a way to > > > partition a discrete natural number. > > > When we partition a single discrete entity of the naturals one realise > > > that infinity is just the limit expressed. > > > The numberline is just a figment of imagination, where we imagine > > > discrete entities lined up. > > > We can take a cut anywhere to represent 7 so the set is a much better > > > analogy to magnitudes then the numberline. > > > Well just my few thoughts around numbers. > > Yes, being an amateur is tough. We feel your pain.
And i feel yours, you can not factor primeproducts, have a hard time with the time complexity of TSP , and do not understand what numbers are. You playing with imaginary entities in your equations that must be real hard.