On 2/3/2013 11:31 AM, christian.bau wrote: > On Feb 3, 3:09 pm, Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensi...@uta.fi> wrote: > >> As an account of the first incompleteness theorem this is of course a >> huge improvement over Australia's leading erotic poet's attempt, but >> taken literally -- and when it comes to these matters we should strive >> to say things that are, literally speaking, true and accurate -- it is >> more or less nonsense nevertheless. > > Please explain. What I wrote is of course the starting point only, but > it is completely accurate. >
Make a simple generalization.... get criticized
Make every effort to be rigorous and precise.... get criticized
Aatu is usually forthright. Hope he gives you some clarification.
I don't know about "completely accurate," however. Even the Wikipedia page is very careful about how they explain the theorems.