The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Finite Rings
Replies: 28   Last Post: Feb 6, 2013 8:33 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Butch Malahide

Posts: 894
Registered: 6/29/05
Re: Finite Rings
Posted: Feb 4, 2013 12:19 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Feb 3, 11:09 pm, quasi <qu...@null.set> wrote:
> William Elliot <> wrote:

> >[In forum "Ask an Algebraist", user "Anu" asks:]
> >> If R is a finite commutative ring without multiplicative
> >> identity and if every element is a zero divisor, then does
> >> there exist a nonzero element which annihilates all elements
> >> of the ring?

> >No - the trivial ring.
> >So add the premise that R has a nonzero element.

> Even with that correction, the answer is still "no".
> Consider the commutative ring R consisting of the following
> seven distinct elements:
>    0, x, y, z, x+y, y+z, z+x

Does this mean that the additive group of R is a group of order 7?

> Besides the usual laws required for R to be a commutative
> ring (without identity), we also require the following
> relations:
>    r^2 = r for all r in R
>    r+r = 0 for all r in R

If r is nonzero, then r is an element of order 2 in the additive
group? What about Lagrange's theorem?

>    xy = yz = zx = 0
> Note that the above relations imply
>    (x+y)z = (y+z)x = (z+x)y = 0
> so every element of R is a zerodivisor.
> However, since all elements of R are idempotent, it follows
> that no nonzero element of R annihilates all elements of R.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.