The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: A good probability puzzle but what is the right wording?
Replies: 10   Last Post: Feb 24, 2013 12:19 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 780
Registered: 7/12/10
A good probability puzzle but what is the right wording?
Posted: Feb 4, 2013 7:02 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

The following puzzle is copied and pasted from the internet.

Alice secretly picks two different real numbers by an unknown process and puts them in two (abstract) envelopes. Bob chooses one of the two envelopes randomly (with a fair coin toss), and shows you the number in that envelope. You must now guess whether the number in the other, closed envelope is larger or smaller than the one you?ve seen.

Is there a strategy which gives you a better than 50% chance of guessing correctly, no matter what procedure Alice used to pick her numbers?


Let X and Y be the two real numbers. People who pose such a problem point out that if you select a probability distribution (it doesn't really matter which one so long as it has the required domain and is continuous), then the probabiilty of making the correct guess is 50% + probability that a random number selected under the solver's distribution is between X and Y.

However, it's difficult to claim that the probability that the random number in the required region is > 0. The problem with the claim is that the secret-number-picker is allowed to use intelligence too. Just as the envelope-selector can claim a probability > 1/2 + epsilon, the number-picker can counter that by pointing out that, for any epsilon, there exists an X-and-Y-picking technique to make the selector's probablity < 1/2 + epsilon.

But the problem does have a very clever idea -- can it be made to work by the right wording? Or is the commonsense answer of "it's always 50/50" correct and the > 50% arguments only make sense by avoiding rigorous definitions.

Thank You,

Paul Epstein

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.