Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: A good probability puzzle but what is the right wording?
Replies: 10   Last Post: Feb 24, 2013 12:19 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 quasi Posts: 12,067 Registered: 7/15/05
Re: A good probability puzzle but what is the right wording?
Posted: Feb 4, 2013 8:15 AM

quasi wrote:
>Paul wrote:
>>
>>The following puzzle is copied and pasted from the internet.
>>
>> Alice secretly picks two different real numbers by an unknown
>> process and puts them in two (abstract) envelopes. Bob
>> chooses one of the two envelopes randomly (with a fair coin
>> toss), and shows you the number in that envelope. You must
>> now guess whether the number in the other, closed envelope
>> is larger or smaller than the one you?ve seen. Is there a
>> strategy which gives you a better than 50% chance of guessing
>> correctly, no matter what procedure Alice used to pick her
>> numbers?

>
>Yes.
>
>Let R denote the set of real numbers and let (0,1) denote
>the open interval from 0 to 1.
>
>Let f : R -> (0,1) be a strictly decreasing function.
>
>Use the following strategy:
>
>If the initially exposed value is t, "switch" with probability
>f(t) and "stay" with probability 1 - f(t).
>
>Suppose Alice chooses the pair x,y with x < y (by whatever
>process, it doesn't matter). After Alice choose that pair,
>then, by following the strategy I specified above, the
>probability of guessing the highest card is exactly
>
> (1/2)*f(x) + (1/2)*(1 - f(y))
>
>which simplifies to
>
> 1/2 + f(x) - f(y)

I meant:

which simplifies to

1/2 + (1/2)*(f(x) - f(y))

>and that exceeds 1/2 since f is strictly decreasing.
>
>Of course, it's not the case that probability of guessing
>correctly is more than c for any fixed c > 1/2, but the
>problem didn't require that.

quasi

Date Subject Author
2/4/13 Paul
2/4/13 quasi
2/4/13 quasi
2/4/13 quasi
2/4/13 David C. Ullrich
2/23/13 Paul
2/24/13 quasi
2/24/13 Paul
2/4/13 RGVickson@shaw.ca
2/5/13 Paul
2/5/13 David Petry