JT
Posts:
1,434
Registered:
4/7/12


Re: Which naturals better?
Posted:
Feb 5, 2013 1:43 AM


On 5 Feb, 04:30, JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 4 Feb, 11:02, Frederick Williams <freddywilli...@btinternet.com> > wrote: > > > JT wrote: > > > > Building new natural numbers without zero using NyaN, in any base, > > > [...] > > > You seem to confuse numbers and digits. Both of these are true: > > There is a number zero. > > Numbers can be symbolized without the digit zero. > > >  > > When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by > > this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him. > > Jonathan Swift: Thoughts on Various Subjects, Moral and Diverting > > No there is no zero in my list of naturals, in my list is each natural > number a discrete ***items***, ***entity*** with a magnitude.
Sorry a single natural is a single entity or item with a certain magnitude, the numbers is counted in forming sets.

