JT
Posts:
436
Registered:
4/7/12
|
|
Re: Which naturals better?
Posted:
Feb 5, 2013 1:43 AM
|
|
On 5 Feb, 04:30, JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4 Feb, 11:02, Frederick Williams <freddywilli...@btinternet.com>
> wrote:
>
> > JT wrote:
>
> > > Building new natural numbers without zero using NyaN, in any base,
> > > [...]
>
> > You seem to confuse numbers and digits. Both of these are true:
> > There is a number zero.
> > Numbers can be symbolized without the digit zero.
>
> > --
> > When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by
> > this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him.
> > Jonathan Swift: Thoughts on Various Subjects, Moral and Diverting
>
> No there is no zero in my list of naturals, in my list is each natural
> number a discrete ***items***, ***entity*** with a magnitude.
Sorry a single natural is a single entity or item with a certain
magnitude, the numbers is counted in forming sets.
|
|
