On 05/02/2013 7:17 AM, William Hughes wrote: > On Feb 5, 10:38 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > <snip> > >> So "there is no list of X" is >> true for every potentially infinite set. > > And so it goes. Now there is no list > of |N. > > So ends this round. It has > taken 100 posts to get WM to > admit that different potentially > infinite sets have different > listability. It would take another > 100 posts to get him to admit > that he admitted it. > > We now know > that the potentially infinite > series 0.111... > > is not a single line of the list > > 0.1000... > 0.11000... > 0.111000... > ... > > More importantly, we have learned that > we can use induction to show "every" > and that "every n -> P(n)" is equivalent > to "there is no m such that ~P(m)" > So we do not need to resort to "all" > to show something does not exist.
One wonders what you have gained by all this. Mueckenheim clearly has not learned, so why do you bother?