Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Finite Rings
Replies: 28   Last Post: Feb 6, 2013 8:33 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
J. Antonio Perez M.

Posts: 2,736
Registered: 12/13/04
Re: Finite Rings
Posted: Feb 5, 2013 11:50 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Wednesday, February 6, 2013 5:13:50 AM UTC+2, William Elliot wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Arturo Magidin wrote:
>

> > > Yet the problem still remains problematic.
>
>
>

> > No, it does not. Under the standard definitions, the zero ring is not a
>
> > counterexample because either (i) it does contain an identity; or (ii)
>
> > it is not considered a ring by those that require 1=/=0.
>
>
>
> Rant and rave, depraved unto grave,
>
> while the trivial becomes dead prey,
>
> the original problem still rings,
>
> with no one dinging a ping nor daring a fling.



Er..."rings" doesn't rhyme with "fling" . Try again, please.



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.