On 6 Feb, 00:55, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > In article > <0359085f-d28e-4b7f-97ab-a309742f3...@y8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > > > > > JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 5 Feb, 09:13, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > > In article > > > <b12ef8c3-edc7-4171-9718-a206477f5...@j9g2000vbz.googlegroups.com>, > > > > JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 5 Feb, 00:21, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > > > > On 4 Feb, 07:34, JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > When the formula to the NyaN completed, i would like to go on make the > > > > > > four elementar base arithemtic operations without any zeros, repeating > > > > > > never hurts. > > > > > > So for any given x in your notation, how does one express x - x without > > > > > any zeroes? > > > > > -- > > > > > I wrote it so many times but you refuse to accept it, there is no > > > > remainder so the difference is simply void > > > > =7-7 > > > > =0,7-0,7 > > > > But how does one differentiate a void as the result a subtraction of a > > > number from itself from not having any subtraction at all? > > > > Does "5 - 5 = " make any kind of sense? > > > -- > > > For 5-5+9 you start with 5-5 and there is no remainder thus 9 not > > 0+9=9 for 5-5/9 thus /9 is no need to evaluate it is not a > > mathematical expression, and should not be taken further into a > > calculation > > thus (5-5)/9+21/3 *IS NOT* (0/9+21/3) it is simply 21/3 what i say is > > we should not evaluate none mathematical expressions. > > Is 9 - 9 a non-mathematical expression in your world? > It looks quite as mathematical as 9 - 8, at least to me. > --
Well in my arethmitic it would of course be evaluated have *NO* remainder, but it would not be taken further into a calculation.