Virgil
Posts:
4,666
Registered:
1/6/11
|
|
Re: Finite Rings
Posted:
Feb 6, 2013 12:17 AM
|
|
In article <1e22793d-04b3-4177-a715-64f05e235817@googlegroups.com>,
Tonicopm@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 6, 2013 5:13:50 AM UTC+2, William Elliot wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Arturo Magidin wrote:
> >
> > > > Yet the problem still remains problematic.
> >
> >
> >
> > > No, it does not. Under the standard definitions, the zero ring is not a
> >
> > > counterexample because either (i) it does contain an identity; or (ii)
> >
> > > it is not considered a ring by those that require 1=/=0.
> >
> >
> >
> > Rant and rave, depraved unto grave,
> >
> > while the trivial becomes dead prey,
> >
> > the original problem still rings,
> >
> > with no one dinging a ping nor daring a fling.
>
>
> Er..."rings" doesn't rhyme with "fling" . Try again, please.
Neither do "grave" and "prey" for that matter.
--
|
|
