Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Finite Rings
Replies: 28   Last Post: Feb 6, 2013 8:33 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Virgil

Posts: 6,993
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Finite Rings
Posted: Feb 6, 2013 12:17 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <1e22793d-04b3-4177-a715-64f05e235817@googlegroups.com>,
Tonicopm@yahoo.com wrote:

> On Wednesday, February 6, 2013 5:13:50 AM UTC+2, William Elliot wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Arturo Magidin wrote:
> >

> > > > Yet the problem still remains problematic.
> >
> >
> >

> > > No, it does not. Under the standard definitions, the zero ring is not a
> >
> > > counterexample because either (i) it does contain an identity; or (ii)
> >
> > > it is not considered a ring by those that require 1=/=0.
> >
> >
> >
> > Rant and rave, depraved unto grave,
> >
> > while the trivial becomes dead prey,
> >
> > the original problem still rings,
> >
> > with no one dinging a ping nor daring a fling.

>
>
> Er..."rings" doesn't rhyme with "fling" . Try again, please.


Neither do "grave" and "prey" for that matter.
--





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.