Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Which naturals better?
Replies: 41   Last Post: Feb 8, 2013 3:49 AM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 JT Posts: 1,448 Registered: 4/7/12
Re: Which naturals better?
Posted: Feb 6, 2013 2:03 AM

On 6 Feb, 06:03, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> In article
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > On 6 Feb, 01:19, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > > In article

>
> > > JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On 5 Feb, 09:06, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > > > > In article
> > > > > <d3216116-2862-491e-a53a-fc52a2d74...@r8g2000vbj.googlegroups.com>,

>
> > > > > JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > On 5 Feb, 04:30, JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > On 4 Feb, 11:02, Frederick Williams <freddywilli...@btinternet.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:

>
> > > > > > > > JT wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > Building new natural numbers without zero using NyaN, in any
> > > > > > > > > base,
> > > > > > > > > [...]

>
> > > > > > > > You seem to confuse numbers and digits. Both of these are true:
> > > > > > > > There is a number zero.
> > > > > > > > Numbers can be symbolized without the digit zero.

>
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by
> > > > > > > > this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him.
> > > > > > > > Jonathan Swift: Thoughts on Various Subjects, Moral and Diverting

>
> > > > > > > No there is no zero in my list of naturals, in my list is each
> > > > > > > natural
> > > > > > > number a discrete ***items***, ***entity*** with a magnitude.

>
> > > > > > Sorry a single natural is a single entity or item with a certain
> > > > > > magnitude, the numbers is counted in forming sets.

>
> > > > > If one counts the members of sets to get natural numbers then counting
> > > > > the members of the empty set shuld give us a natural too.
> > > > > --

>
> > > > Isn't it the members forming sets, without any member how can there be
> > > > a set?

>
> > > Given any two sets, one should have an intersection set whose mambers
> > > are only those in both of the given sets, so what is the intersection
> > > set for {1,3,5} and {2,4,6} if not an empty set?

>
> > > > The set is just a placeholder for numbers, it is not a mathematical
> > > > entity.

>
> > > A set is a container for whatever one wished to put in it.
>
> > > > Balls and buckets (bucket 1=6 balls) (bucket 2=3 balls) now i pour
> > > > over the three balls to the bucket 2 and we have nine balls in bucket
> > > > two. And you ask me what todo with the empty bucket?

>
> > > Do you not believe a bucket can be empty?
> > > --

>
> > If i pour over balls from two buckets to a third, there is really no
> > need to keep count upon the two empty buckets. Example 3+6+9 now we
> > fill last bucket with the balls of the previous according to your
> > definition there still will be 0+0+9. It is just moronic.

>
> What you have just claimed is considerably more moronic.
>
> In what I regard as a reasonable world, such a shift as you describe
> from 3+6+9 will result in 0+0+18, not 0+0+9
> --

Send it to the debugger, let him look at those two zeros while he is
on it ;D

Date Subject Author
2/4/13 JT
2/4/13 Virgil
2/5/13 JT
2/4/13 Frederick Williams
2/4/13 JT
2/5/13 JT
2/5/13 JT
2/5/13 JT
2/5/13 JT
2/5/13 JT
2/5/13
2/5/13 JT
2/5/13 Virgil
2/5/13 JT
2/5/13 Virgil
2/5/13 JT
2/6/13 Virgil
2/6/13 JT
2/6/13 Virgil
2/6/13 JT
2/6/13 Virgil
2/6/13 JT
2/7/13 Virgil
2/5/13 Virgil
2/5/13
2/5/13 JT
2/5/13 Virgil
2/5/13 JT
2/5/13 JT
2/6/13 Virgil
2/6/13 JT
2/6/13 Virgil
2/6/13 JT
2/6/13 Virgil
2/7/13 Brian Q. Hutchings
2/5/13 Virgil
2/5/13
2/5/13 Frederick Williams
2/5/13 Virgil
2/7/13 HOPEINCHRIST
2/7/13 Brian Q. Hutchings
2/8/13 JT