|
|
Re: Mathematica and Lisp
Posted:
Feb 6, 2013 1:51 AM
|
|
On 2/3/2013 5:20 PM, John Doty wrote:
....
You seem to think I haven't written Mathematica programs.
Maybe looking at the appendix here would change your mind.
Maybe not, though.
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~fateman/papers/better-rules.pdf
(JD writes..)
>
> Considered as software failures, both of these occurred in application code and were not the result of programming language deficiencies.
Was the code not written in a programming language?
Even if it was written in assembler, that too is
a programming language. I expect that the bug
occurred because the programmer did not realize the
semantics of the code.
>I don't find Mathematica to be especially mysterious relative to its capabilities.
Mathematica the language is, I think, relatively mysterious. The
application underneath it adds both capabilities and extra mystery.
>
>>
>> (RJF)
I would hope you would be very aware of the Ariane 5
>>
>> and similar disasters.
>
> I am aware of those, as well as many that you've never heard of.
How would you know that I don't know? Are they secret?
>
> Not all bugs are of equal importance. An error of 5.5E-79 in a Bessel function is very unlikely
>to cause trouble in a practical application.
One of the marvels of computing today is that it is possible to do so
much in such a short time.
One can execute billions of instructions a second. If only
one in a million does the wrong thing, and is wrong only
by a tiny percent, you can accumulate a whopping mistake
in a second.
I've been using Mathematica to do practical work since version 1,
> and I've never encountered a bug in its numerics.
I guess it is my turn to wonder if YOU know much about Mathematica.
>
> Crazy results from numerical codes are a normal occurrance,
>...
> I don't find Mathematica to be unusually hazardous here.
I guess I disagree on this point.
>
>> This is pretty far afield from the original question which I
>>
>> think was somehow...s Mathematica somehow Lisp-like.... should I learn Lisp...
>
> I'm unusual in that I write practical engineering code in Scheme (a Lisp dialect),
> along with code for both science and engineering in Mathematica.
I think that is unusual, but I count it as a good thing. Though
Common Lisp (a Lisp dialect) is used in space computations --
the Hubble telescope. For more applications, see
http://common-lisp.net/~dlw/LispSurvey.html
...
>
> Programming language specialists have many interesting ideas,
> but lousy judgement when it comes to which ones are important
>in any particular application context.
Somewhat over-generalized, I think.
.....
RJF
|
|
