On 6 Feb., 02:34, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: > On 2/5/2013 11:02 AM, WM wrote: > > > On 5 Feb., 17:06, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: > > This correspondence is as impossible, as I have shown above, as > > finding a set of natural numbers with negative sum. > > No.
If you think no, then explain this: > Have you ever seen a Cantor-list where more than half of the interesting sequences (a_j) of digits a_kj with k < j had infinite length? Have you ever seen a Cantor-list with at least one of the interesting sequences of digits having infinite length? No? Why the heck do you believe that they play the crucial role in Cantor's "proof"?