|
|
Re: Matheology § 210
Posted:
Feb 6, 2013 9:46 AM
|
|
On 6 Feb., 02:34, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> On 2/5/2013 11:02 AM, WM wrote:
>
> > On 5 Feb., 17:06, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> > This correspondence is as impossible, as I have shown above, as
> > finding a set of natural numbers with negative sum.
>
> No.
If you think no, then explain this:
>
Have you ever seen a Cantor-list where more than half of the
interesting sequences (a_j) of digits a_kj with k < j had infinite
length? Have you ever seen a Cantor-list with at least one of the
interesting sequences of digits having infinite length? No? Why the
heck do you believe that they play the crucial role in Cantor's
"proof"?
Regards, WM
|
|
