Virgil
Posts:
4,483
Registered:
1/6/11
|
|
Re: Matheology � 210
Posted:
Feb 6, 2013 4:36 PM
|
|
In article
<94627a17-8096-465f-abe5-acebf199fc6d@p17g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 6 Feb., 02:34, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> > On 2/5/2013 11:02 AM, WM wrote:
> >
> > > On 5 Feb., 17:06, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> > > This correspondence is as impossible, as I have shown above, as
> > > finding a set of natural numbers with negative sum.
> >
> > No.
>
> If you think no, then explain this:
> >
> Have you ever seen a Cantor-list where more than half of the
> interesting sequences (a_j) of digits a_kj with k < j had infinite
> length?
Those with finite length can be infinitely extended with 0's.
> Have you ever seen a Cantor-list with at least one of the
> interesting sequences of digits having infinite length?
All of them have infinite length, though some may be either truncated or
rounded to lesser lengths.
--
|
|
