Virgil
Posts:
4,483
Registered:
1/6/11
|
|
Re: Matheology � 210
Posted:
Feb 7, 2013 2:33 AM
|
|
In article
<c90e5c01-f477-420d-89c1-1ad75c5bfcab@hq4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 7 Feb., 05:10, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
>
> > The proof requires a presupposition of
> > individuated numbers named using a consistent naming algorithm
> > based on a finite set of sequentially ordered symbols.
>
> Individuation by x without any means to determine the individuating x
> is not individuation.
>
> You are very good in parroting undigested readings about logic.
> Now try to learn to apply the basics.
>
WM is hardly in a position to carp over other people's parroting
"undigested reading about logic" or alleged" misunderstandings of the
basics".
WM has racked up impressive amounts of both here.
--
|
|
