In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 7 Feb., 05:10, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: > > > The proof requires a presupposition of > > individuated numbers named using a consistent naming algorithm > > based on a finite set of sequentially ordered symbols. > > Individuation by x without any means to determine the individuating x > is not individuation. > > You are very good in parroting undigested readings about logic. > Now try to learn to apply the basics. >
WM is hardly in a position to carp over other people's parroting "undigested reading about logic" or alleged" misunderstandings of the basics".
WM has racked up impressive amounts of both here. --