Virgil
Posts:
7,011
Registered:
1/6/11


Re: Matheology 203
Posted:
Feb 7, 2013 2:42 AM


In article <c333f4f2df06434d868433e4553c11a9@j4g2000vby.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fhaugsburg.de> wrote:
> On 6 Feb., 23:10, Ralf Bader <ba...@nefkom.net> wrote: > > > > I don't know what Brouwer believed. I know what he wrote > > > > but you don't understand it. > > > > > : Cantor's 2nd > > > number class does not exist. > > > Of course, when discrepancies between Brouwer and, ummmh, you show up then > > Brouwer is wrong and you are right. > > I cannot see any difference between Brouwers sentence "Cantor's 2nd > number class does not exist"
But between Brouwers existence of actually infinite sets and WM's nonexistence of actually infinite sets there is an unbridgable gap, with WM on the wrong end of it. 

