On 7 Feb., 10:03, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 7, 7:45 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > Matheology § 222 Back to the roots > > > Consider a Cantor-list with entries a_n and anti-diagonal d: > > Then, according to WM, d is not a line of the list.
Do you agree that the logic applied in set theory does not make a difference between "for every" and "for all"? Can you explain why here, in this decisive case, a difference appears nevertheless?