Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Matheology 203
Replies: 16   Last Post: Feb 7, 2013 8:06 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Virgil

Posts: 9,012
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology 203
Posted: Feb 7, 2013 4:40 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article
<3d2ccdea-0a70-433b-9e1b-22832f97b73a@y9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 7 Feb., 09:27, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > <30e6f8dd-f487-4335-ba77-35f182b79...@e10g2000vbv.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> > > On 7 Feb., 08:53, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > <457d0429-33c1-46ad-9151-4f5d9dc96...@fv9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,

> >
> > > >  WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > > > > On 7 Feb., 05:21, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > Or as Virgil would write
> >
> > > > > in a very lucid moment:
> >
> > > > > > What Cantor proved was that no list of accessible real numbers
> > > > > > (accessible because listable) can include all accessible numbers,
> > > > > > because any such list itself proves the existence of numbers not
> > > > > > listed.

> >
> > > > > That is, Cantor proved the countable set of accessible numbers being
> > > > > uncoutable.

> >
> > > > That may well be WM's misunderstanding but it is not an understanding.
> >
> > > > A number being accessible does means that it can appear in some list,
> > > > but does not at all mean that all accessible numbers can appear
> > > > together
> > > > in a single list.

> >
> > > All elements of countable sets can be counted by definition, i.e.,
> > > they can appear in a list.

> >
> > But some subsets of a set may be countable even though the set itself is
> > not.

>
> Of course, the algebraic real numbers for instance, or the definable
> real numbers.
>

> > Certainly SOME sets of reals can be counted but not every set of
> > reals can be counted.

>
> My question has been this: Why are there countable sets that are
> uncountable?



That is a question that only those trapped in WMytheology would ask, as
nowhere else does it make any sense.
--





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.