Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum


Math Forum
 Ask Dr. Math
 Discussions
 Internet Newsletter
 MathTools
 Problems of the Week
 Teacher2Teacher
 Teacher Exchange
 Workshops

Search All of the Math Forum:
Browse our Internet Mathematics Library

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Matheology 203
Replies: 16   Last Post: Feb 7, 2013 8:06 AM

Advanced Search
Reply to this Topic Reply to this Topic

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
fom

Posts: 1,037
Registered: 12/4/12
Re: Matheology 203
Posted: Feb 7, 2013 8:06 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 2/7/2013 1:20 AM, WM wrote:
> On 7 Feb., 05:21, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
>
>> Or as Virgil would write
>
> in a very lucid moment:
>
>> What Cantor proved was that no list of accessible real numbers
>> (accessible because listable) can include all accessible numbers,
>> because any such list itself proves the existence of numbers not listed.
>
> That is, Cantor proved the countable set of accessible numbers being
> uncoutable.

Once again demonstrating a complete lack
of understanding as to the meaning or
correct use of the term PROOF

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2013. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.