On 2/7/2013 1:33 AM, Virgil wrote: > In article > <email@example.com>, > WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > >> On 7 Feb., 05:10, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: >> >>> The proof requires a presupposition of >>> individuated numbers named using a consistent naming algorithm >>> based on a finite set of sequentially ordered symbols. >> >> Individuation by x without any means to determine the individuating x >> is not individuation. >> >> You are very good in parroting undigested readings about logic. >> Now try to learn to apply the basics. >> > > WM is hardly in a position to carp over other people's parroting > "undigested reading about logic" or alleged" misunderstandings of the > basics". > > WM has racked up impressive amounts of both here. >
WM is too stupid to even understand my version of the "basics".