fom
Posts:
1,037
Registered:
12/4/12
|
|
Re: Matheology § 210
Posted:
Feb 7, 2013 8:11 AM
|
|
On 2/7/2013 1:33 AM, Virgil wrote:
> In article
> <c90e5c01-f477-420d-89c1-1ad75c5bfcab@hq4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
> WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>
>> On 7 Feb., 05:10, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
>>
>>> The proof requires a presupposition of
>>> individuated numbers named using a consistent naming algorithm
>>> based on a finite set of sequentially ordered symbols.
>>
>> Individuation by x without any means to determine the individuating x
>> is not individuation.
>>
>> You are very good in parroting undigested readings about logic.
>> Now try to learn to apply the basics.
>>
>
> WM is hardly in a position to carp over other people's parroting
> "undigested reading about logic" or alleged" misunderstandings of the
> basics".
>
> WM has racked up impressive amounts of both here.
>
WM is too stupid to even understand my version of
the "basics".
|
|
