|
|
Re: Matheology § 210
Posted:
Feb 7, 2013 2:45 PM
|
|
On Feb 7, 8:42 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 7 Feb., 20:35, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 7, 8:27 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>
> > > The list if defined, would have a defined anti-diagonal.
>
> > Ah. Richard's paradox. From Wikipedia
>
> > Thus the resolution of Richard's paradox is that there
> > is no way to unambiguously determine exactly which
> > English sentences are definitions of real numbers
>
> Anyhow, there are countably many.
>
Yes, and there is a list of them
|
|
