In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 7 Feb., 20:35, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Feb 7, 8:27 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > > > The list if defined, would have a defined anti-diagonal. > > > > Ah. Richard's paradox. From Wikipedia > > > > Thus the resolution of Richard's paradox is that there > > is no way to unambiguously determine exactly which > > English sentences are definitions of real numbers > > Only a defined list can have a defined antidiagonal. > It is Cantor's paradox that the reals are believed to be uncountable. > > His defined lists produce defined, hence countable, reals. > His undefined lists produce nothing - but matheologians.
Cantor's work has produced the ill in Wolkenmuekenheim, to the eternal deteriment of both mathematics and logic. --