|
|
Re: Re: Matheology § 210
Posted:
Feb 8, 2013 1:46 PM
|
|
In article <2479f40f-751a-45c3-bb60-40cd5ef05a17@p17g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> writes:
>On 8 Feb., 18:14, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
>> On 2/8/2013 2:41 AM, WM wrote:
>> > Standard terminology is that X is countable iff X is listable.
>>
>> Please cite a source for "listable"
>
>A set is listable means, that it can be written as a sequence (with no
>repeating terms - but that is not important). Listable is identical
>with countable.
You appear to be unable to cite a source for this usage, which leads
observers to believe that it is not standard terminology. After all,
if it was standard terminology instead of your private language,
your response to a request for a source would be to provide one, not
to restate your private definition in a different fashion.
--
Michael F. Stemper
#include <Standard_Disclaimer>
If it's "tourist season", where do I get my license?
|
|
