On 8 Feb., 19:46, mstem...@walkabout.empros.com (Michael Stemper) wrote: > In article <2479f40f-751a-45c3-bb60-40cd5ef05...@p17g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> writes: > > >On 8 Feb., 18:14, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: > >> On 2/8/2013 2:41 AM, WM wrote: > >> > Standard terminology is that X is countable iff X is listable. > > >> Please cite a source for "listable" > > >A set is listable means, that it can be written as a sequence (with no > >repeating terms - but that is not important). Listable is identical > >with countable. > > You appear to be unable to cite a source for this usage, which leads > observers to believe that it is not standard terminology. After all, > if it was standard terminology instead of your private language, > your response to a request for a source would be to provide one, not > to restate your private definition in a different fashion.
A list is an enumerated set of entries. If entries can appear more than once then it is simply a sequence. This definition is known by every expert. Asking for it shows a high measure of ignorance. And everyone who does not know it, should be glad to get it kindly explained. In no case he is entitled to be treated like an interlocutor in a scientific dispute.