Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Matheology § 210
Replies: 3   Last Post: Feb 8, 2013 5:38 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Virgil

Posts: 9,012
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 210
Posted: Feb 8, 2013 5:38 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article
<1bb84cad-6d02-40fc-bb22-26a49ddd87d6@p17g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 8 Feb., 19:41, Alan Smaill <sma...@SPAMinf.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
>

> > You miss the point as ever --  you are suggesting that
> > intuitionists were bullied into making a claim that Hilbert et al
> > did *not* accept, viz:

>
> They were forced to assert that subcountability in constructivism is
> not in contradiction with uncountability in matheology.


Except that "matheology" does not exist anywhere outside of WM's
braincase. who forced whom and how?

And in what way would they have wanted to claim that it is in
contradiction?
--





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.