On Feb 9, 11:59 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > On 9 Feb., 00:49, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 8, 11:38 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > > On 8 Feb., 23:26, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:> More WM logic > > > > > L is a potentially infinite > > > > list and d is the potentially infinite > > > > anti-diagonal > > > > > From > > > > i. For every natural number n, d > > > > is not the nth line of L > > > > correct. > > > > > ii. i. implies that there is no > > > > natural number m such that > > > > d is the mth line of L > > > > No such m can be fixed. > > > Your claim is that no such m exists.- > > You argue
Nope, the arguments are yours and the statements are yours
