Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum


Math Forum
 Ask Dr. Math
 Discussions
 Internet Newsletter
 MathTools
 Problems of the Week
 Teacher2Teacher
 Teacher Exchange
 Workshops

Search All of the Math Forum:
Browse our Internet Mathematics Library

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: missing neutrino energy Pauli's 1930s #1207 New Physics #1327 ATOM
TOTALITY 5th ed
Replies: 5   Last Post: Feb 9, 2013 5:38 PM

Advanced Search
Reply to this Topic Reply to this Topic

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
bacle

Posts: 839
From: nyc
Registered: 6/6/10
Re: no physicist today knows how axioms of math work #1213 New Physics #1333 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
Posted: Feb 9, 2013 5:38 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Asshole:

Basic decency and basic fairness would require you
to allow others to speak for themselves, instead of
your putting words in their mouth --in a cowardly way,
by not doing it to their faces.

On top of being a moron, you're cowardly and dishonest.

Moreover, asswipe, from what data have you drawn your
conclusion on physicists' knowledge of "how axioms
of math work"? Have you drawn a random sample? Answer:
no; you just made the whole thing up, like you make up
everything you write. You seem to believe that your
strong wording with nothing to support it is good
science, or even science at all.

You're a FRAUD.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2013. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.