The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: missing neutrino energy Pauli's 1930s #1207 New Physics #1327 ATOM

Replies: 5   Last Post: Feb 9, 2013 5:38 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 838
From: nyc
Registered: 6/6/10
Re: no physicist today knows how axioms of math work #1213 New Physics #1333 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
Posted: Feb 9, 2013 5:38 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply


Basic decency and basic fairness would require you
to allow others to speak for themselves, instead of
your putting words in their mouth --in a cowardly way,
by not doing it to their faces.

On top of being a moron, you're cowardly and dishonest.

Moreover, asswipe, from what data have you drawn your
conclusion on physicists' knowledge of "how axioms
of math work"? Have you drawn a random sample? Answer:
no; you just made the whole thing up, like you make up
everything you write. You seem to believe that your
strong wording with nothing to support it is good
science, or even science at all.

You're a FRAUD.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.