On 10 Feb., 22:05, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: > On 2/10/2013 3:54 AM, WM wrote: > > > On 9 Feb., 21:39, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > >> What exceeds in length every fis is of not finite (infinite) length. > > > In the list > > > 1 > > 11 > > 111 > > ... > > > There is no FIS of the diagonal that is loinger than every line. > > For everey line, there is a longer FIS of the diagonal. > > For every FIS of the diagonal, there is a longer line. > > And, so we see the confusion over the meaning > of singular term. > > And, so we see the confusion over the meaning > of a definite article. > > the diagonal is different from its proper parts.
