On 2/10/2013 3:18 PM, WM wrote: > On 10 Feb., 22:05, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: >> On 2/10/2013 3:54 AM, WM wrote: >> >>> On 9 Feb., 21:39, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: >> >>>> What exceeds in length every fis is of not finite (infinite) length. >> >>> In the list >> >>> 1 >>> 11 >>> 111 >>> ... >> >>> There is no FIS of the diagonal that is loinger than every line. >>> For everey line, there is a longer FIS of the diagonal. >>> For every FIS of the diagonal, there is a longer line. >> >> And, so we see the confusion over the meaning >> of singular term. >> >> And, so we see the confusion over the meaning >> of a definite article. >> >> the diagonal is different from its proper parts.
