The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 210
Replies: 24   Last Post: Feb 12, 2013 1:12 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 1,968
Registered: 12/4/12
Re: Matheology § 210
Posted: Feb 10, 2013 4:42 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 2/10/2013 5:07 AM, WM wrote:
> On 10 Feb., 00:04, Ralf Bader <> wrote:

>>> And here is a not very important but very interesting example: In
>>> MathOverflow I am not welcome.

>> That is: You are no longer welcome.

> because I show what a silly theory matheolgy is and what contradictory
> arguments the matheologians there apply. For instance the Binary Tree
> with level omega!

>>> Everything is immediately deleted.
>>> Therefore, in June 2010 I put a question under cover.

>> If they tell you to stay away you have to do this - as
>> a moral obligation and as a legal obligation.

> As I have shown and as any sober mind will understand they cannot tell
> anything to anybody but to IP-addresses. They have no legal power to
> censor the internet. Anonymous appearance is explicitly allowed.

It is unlikely that propositional logic is
foundational just because it can be differentiated
from its various extensions.

We learn deontic logic from our corporeal limitations
in the world.

We apply deontic logic because of bad behavior like
that above.

Then we suffer the consequences of absolute power
from time to time in our history.

> Minorities always had to find their own ways.

To call yourself a minority because of your finitist
views may be correct. However, you do not bring
mathematical discussions involving the research
of either mathematicians or logicians who actually
do productive contrarian studies.

You are a terrorist in spirit. And, your statement is
the logic of reminiscent to that a terrorist uses.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.