On 10 Feb., 22:28, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: > On 2/10/2013 3:18 PM, WM wrote: > > > > > > > On 10 Feb., 22:05, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: > >> On 2/10/2013 3:54 AM, WM wrote: > > >>> On 9 Feb., 21:39, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > >>>> What exceeds in length every fis is of not finite (infinite) length. > > >>> In the list > > >>> 1 > >>> 11 > >>> 111 > >>> ... > > >>> There is no FIS of the diagonal that is loinger than every line. > >>> For everey line, there is a longer FIS of the diagonal. > >>> For every FIS of the diagonal, there is a longer line. > > >> And, so we see the confusion over the meaning > >> of singular term. > > >> And, so we see the confusion over the meaning > >> of a definite article. > > >> the diagonal is different from its proper parts. > > Define a digit.-
