In article <4106e64c-2623-467e-aa6b-1b343ffc24fa@h17g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 9 Feb., 21:59, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > > > You have already agreed hat d is not actually infinite > > > > When or where do you allege that I have done anything so foolish? > > Better ask when you have not. But I see that I erroneously assumed > William had been the author. > WM's list of things that he erroneously assumes is as close to actually infinite as he will ever get. --